Category: C++ Computer Applications
Blog Entry Tuesday, May 28, 2024, Quantum Mechanics by James Pate Williams, Jr.
Text and Exercise from “Boundary Value Problems Second Edition” by David L. Powers in Progress (c) Wednesday, April 17, 2024, James Pate Williams, Jr.
Solution of the Laplace (Potential) Equation on a Two-Dimensional Square via Finite Differences
Solution of the One-Dimensional Heat Equation for a Rod Using Finite Differences by James Pate Williams, Jr. Created on Wednesday April 3, 2024
Undamped Mass-Spring Eigenvalue – Eigenvector Problem by James Pate Williams, Jr. (c) Monday April 1, 2024
We extend the results of the following website:

The five masses in the problem have a maximum value of 8. The six springs have a maximum value of 4 for their Hooke’s coefficients. The first 5 by 5 matrix is the inverse mass matrix, the second matrix is the Hooke’s coefficient 5 by 5 matrix, the third 5 by 5 matrix is the product of the inverse mass matrix times the Hooke’s coefficient matrix. The final row vector is the eigenvalue vector.
Lau Large Integer Calculator © March 27-28 by James Pate Williams, Jr. All Applicable Rights Reserved
Complex Number Calculator © March 25-26 by James Pate Williams, Jr.
New 1d Integration Results (c) March 24, 2024, by James Pate Williams, Jr.
I tested NUMAL’s integration function versus homegrown trapezoidal rule and Simpson’s rule. The second and third algorithms were closed (included both endpoints). There exist higher order Newton-Cotes integration formulas. I did not test the Gauss-Legendre and/or Gauss-Laguerre integration method(s). The trapezoidal rule can be improved if the derivative of the integrand is known and is easily calculated.